easy_install xxxx is easier, does more for you than:python setup.py install
so one's a good repalcement for the other... but there IS NO setup.py in web2py --- there is NO INSTALL so I think your thinking in general is good; in this instance, there is no gain! :-) Yarko On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Wes James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would there be any benefit of eggifying web2py? I have used > easy_install to install py stuff and am wondering if it would be good > to stick it on pypi so we could just: > > easy_install web2py > > just wondering..... maybe one more avenue of exposer > > But I guess easy_install puts things in the py lib and that's not > really where I'd want it. If easy_install allows for a path to > install it, that might work, but I'm not sure how this would all > work.... any ideas? > > -wj > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
