Massimo As you say, the proposal can be implemented as a module so as to not compromise backwards-compatibility.
I am happy to come up with some code but it would be really helpful if people could contribute their 2 cents early on to ensure a good "alternative" approach. On Nov 10, 6:46 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > if I had seen this one year, it is possible web2py would have looked > this this. > Now we need to maintain backward compatibility so we cannot change it. > Anyway, the structure you propose can be implemented on top of web2py > as a module. > If you code it, please share it with us. It could be used to build a > better T2. > > Massimo > > On Nov 10, 7:23 am, billf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All > > > I know that there is a patch related to custom views in the pipeline > > but this proposal is another step on from that. > > > I am proposing an additional approach that enables those things that > > (I consider) are view-related to be moved from the model and > > controller to the view. In addition, it provides separation of html > > form from model related logic such as validation and db updating. > > > There are still some areas to be covered but I have written a page > > that, hopefully, explains the ideas at > > >http://www.wellbehavedsystems.co.uk/web2py/examples/mvc.html > > > All comments gratefully accepted. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
