On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:16:32 +0000 Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 24 November 2017 at 11:59, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:45:48 +0200 > > Alexandros Frantzis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2. Should we introduce similar timestamp events for keyboard and pointer? > > > > No, unless someone actually has a use for them. That brings the > > question, why are you only interested in touch timestamps and not > > keyboard and pointer? > > > > Why are keyboard and pointer latency not interesting to you? > > I would very much suggest doing so, yeah. Having timestamps for > high-frequency/resolution mice seems like a real need. Given the need > to correllate the event streams (e.g. 'is someone holding down Ctrl > whilst I scroll?'), it makes it easier for clients if we have > comparable timestamps between the two. Right, let's have them for all the timestamped core input events, not only touch. Thanks, pq
pgpVwhzfyP5Z1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
