incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/scheduler/IdempotentSchedulerTest.java
incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/scheduler/knobs/ControllerTest.java
incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/scheduler/testing/FakeTimerServiceTest.java

seems to only be 3, I have updated on that branch the version of mockito
which had its own things to fix but they should be good now. I cant touch
things again till this time tomorrow so feel free to choose which ones you
want.

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 22:04 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure, I guess I can help with this. How we coordinate to ensure we don't
> work on the same tests? Would you like to send me a few test class names to
> work on?
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:59 PM Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We shouldn't have 2 mocking libraries and mockito is the superior one
> since
> > its continually maintained. We can even do fancy things like this
> > http://google.github.io/gwtmockito/ in the future to aid in having the
> gwt
> > js library well tested.
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 21:50 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Great news, thanks Evan!
> > > Regarding mockito - what are the issues?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:20 PM Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > Been working on removing old dependencies and updating dependencies
> as
> > > can
> > > > be seen here
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/tree/fix/dependendices-2016
> .
> > > It
> > > > seems we have to mocking lib's in use, if anyone is good with mockito
> > > would
> > > > you kindly help in transiting the tests with the other mocking
> library
> > > > (jmock)?
> > > >
> > > > In other news ive been working on replacing the GXP (Google XML
> Pages)
> > > > which create html pages from a xml markup into standard HTML. This is
> > > work
> > > > being done to seperate the frontend and make it more modern, more
> will
> > be
> > > > shown in coming week. After GXP is removed attention will then turn
> to
> > > the
> > > > Protobuf setup we have which atm needs to go through another
> utility, I
> > > > hope to remove this extra step with the transition to proto3. This
> > would
> > > > mean the sub project PST (protobuf strings templates), would be
> > > depreciated
> > > > and can be lost to the void.
> > > >
> > > > After this transitioning the clicent away from the server will be top
> > > > priority to allow swellrt to integrate without having bloat. Tis does
> > not
> > > > mean Wave's intentional purpose is being changed but the entire UI
> will
> > > be
> > > > getting an upgrade as it gets transitioned, so expect to see new
> mixed
> > > with
> > > > old for a little while.
> > > >
> > > > ~ Evan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to