maybe instead of deciding the end instead you and Christian set goals that must be completed by the next checkpoint aka have x amount of submits, have x more active contributors to help gain momentum. If the tasks are not completed sufficiently or dismally fail then sure maybe its for the best.
On 7 October 2015 at 22:44, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well as the video discussion we had earlier this year, the main problem > has been the complexity. We have been taking steps in this direction with; > > * reducing technical debt (removing updating dependencies), can bee seen > from patches last week and there has been work in a gradle or sbt build > system which allows people to understand how the project works together. > > I personally have been looking into giving the website a fresh coat of > paint in the past couple of weeks (infrastructures docs on building locally > are eh if not on a mac ;) but did get it working). We have also had the > addition of the android project for wave. > > Progress might be slow but progress is still being made. > > On 7 October 2015 at 20:54, Upayavira <upayav...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I need to sign off the Wave report, but find this difficult. >> >> The Apache Incubator exists to facilitate projects moving towards being >> fully fledged ASF projects. Wave has been >> incubating since 2010, and in that time it has not yet been able to >> build a community that is likely to sustain itself as an ASF >> project. >> >> It does, therefore, seem to me that it is time for us to retire as a >> podling, and allow people here to continue in a location more fitting >> with the current level of effort, without the expectation that it needs >> to meet some specific set of incubation requirements. >> >> Note that all of the source code is Apache Licensed, meaning it can be >> forked elsewhere - the only discussion required is the name that the >> relocated project would take. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Upayavira >> > >
