> On Sept. 26, 2015, 10:52 a.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Changes LGTM.
> > 
> > What do you mean by 'latest' GWT jars? Do you mean built from master 
> > (11a0d2e), or built from the 2.7.0 tag?
> > I think we should commit this change at the same time as updating the GWT 
> > jars stored in third_party/.

Sorry, I should have clarified: with 'latest' I mean built from master 
(11a0d2e).

The Impl::getNextHashId() method was removed after 2.7.0 so the current code 
works fine up to 2.7.0.
This change is backwards compatible so I don't think it's necessary to update 
the third_party libs as part of this change.

In a followup, I'm planning to send a change to update the libs to GWT 2.7.0.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38785/#review100748
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 26, 2015, 9:17 a.m., Martin Letis wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38785/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 26, 2015, 9:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
> 
> 
> Repository: wave
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> As of 
> https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt/+/6d27b4615004569c68c7bbf2b3d04a6c942cd493 
> the method is no longer available.
> 
> Calling Object#hashCode() should "Just Work (TM)" both for jso and java, as 
> the 'emul' implementation both before and after dankurka's change default to 
> the previous implementation in JsIdentity{Map,Set}.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/common/util/JsIdentityMap.java d321b1e 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/common/util/JsIdentitySet.java 9f7f6e1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38785/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ant compile compile-gwt works with latest GWT jars
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Letis
> 
>

Reply via email to