- It seems that some edition shortcuts are broken since the akaplanov
>Profiling functionality:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/22776/
>(as a workaround I reverted FocusManager.java in my branch).

Instead of having write this here you could write your patch.
Or create Jira request.
In any case, the benefit would be greater than from this blah-blah.
Profiling patch was quite large to take into account all the consequences.
I believe that in such cases it is appropriate to wait for help from the
community instead of belated criticism.

2015-03-25 19:21 GMT+05:00 Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <v...@ourproject.org>:

> El 24/03/15 a las 12:12, Christian Grobmeier escribió:
> > we have volunteers for the next months. Why not discussing what we
> > should do?
> >
> > My first preference would be: craft a release.
> > I forgot what was missing back then, but it would be great to find out
> > from the mail archives and create jira issues for the open things. Maybe
> > Ali could help here, as he was the RM for the last try.
> >
> > The next thing would maybe be more technical. Can you throw in some
> > concrete ideas what could be achieved in small steps?
> > I guess "refactoring everything" is not a good start :)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Christian
> >
>
> >From my point of view there are several "basic" bugs that should be
> addressed:
>
> - The wave edition should work in major/modern browsers.
> - There are several concurrent edition and persist issues (Yuri
> mentioned it).
> - It seems that some edition shortcuts are broken since the akaplanov
> Profiling functionality:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22776/
> (as a workaround I reverted FocusManager.java in my branch).
> - Inbox search issues (unread counts, etc) in other storages different
> that memory.
> - The gwt superdev mode should work (editor, wavehardness, and full
> client) so new developers can contribute easily.
> - For that, we should upgrade to gwt 2.7. Review 22776 also affects
> this: there is a wip patch in this list.
> - The tests (including gwt-test) should pass without errors.
> - There are a lists of issues related with gadgets (some are missing or
> broken, browser compatibility issues, it seems to me that gmodules.com
> gadget server should be replaced by a new one maintained by us).
>
> If edition+concurrent-edit+shortcuts+persistence+gadgets does not work
> correctly, people would prefer to use a simple non-concurrent html
> TextArea instead of wave :O)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Vicente
>

Reply via email to