Looks like we do need xmpp.jar at least for runtime, not sure about whack.jar The websocket.jar looks is not used as i was able to run the server and tests without it. I guess we need to return the dependency on xmpp and whack, but preferably to use public third party repositories.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Done in 10db75a. > > On 25 August 2014 18:54, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like we actually don't use this dependency anymore. I removed the > jar > > from Git. > > @Ali, can you please commit\push the updates for two other jars? > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier < > grobme...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> MIT should be no problem actually. > >> > >> You may want to check that page: > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I guess MIT license should allow this, right? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 03:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > >> >> > I would expect LICENSE/NOTICE to need to be updated to include it. > >> >> > > >> >> > @Christian: Can we do this for the single file that makes up > >> >> > websocket.jar? > >> >> > >> >> We can place a source file into source control, so long as we can > comply > >> >> with the terms of its license (note, some licenses mandate inclusion > in > >> >> a binary form). > >> >> > >> >> Upayavira > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.grobmeier.de > >> https://www.timeandbill.de > >> >
