Looks like we do need xmpp.jar at least for runtime, not sure about
whack.jar
The websocket.jar looks is not used as i was able to run the server and
tests without it. I guess we need to return the dependency on xmpp and
whack, but preferably to use public third party repositories.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:

> Done in 10db75a.
>
> On 25 August 2014 18:54, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looks like we actually don't use this dependency anymore. I removed the
> jar
> > from Git.
> > @Ali, can you please commit\push the updates for two other jars?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier <
> grobme...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> MIT should be no problem actually.
> >>
> >> You may want to check that page:
> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I guess MIT license should allow this, right?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 03:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> >> >> > I would expect LICENSE/NOTICE to need to be updated to include it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > @Christian: Can we do this for the single file that makes up
> >> >> > websocket.jar?
> >> >>
> >> >> We can place a source file into source control, so long as we can
> comply
> >> >> with the terms of its license (note, some licenses mandate inclusion
> in
> >> >> a binary form).
> >> >>
> >> >> Upayavira
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> https://www.timeandbill.de
> >>
>

Reply via email to