Looks like we actually don't use this dependency anymore. I removed the jar from Git. @Ali, can you please commit\push the updates for two other jars?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > MIT should be no problem actually. > > You may want to check that page: > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I guess MIT license should allow this, right? > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 03:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > >> > I would expect LICENSE/NOTICE to need to be updated to include it. > >> > > >> > @Christian: Can we do this for the single file that makes up > >> > websocket.jar? > >> > >> We can place a source file into source control, so long as we can comply > >> with the terms of its license (note, some licenses mandate inclusion in > >> a binary form). > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de >
