Of what benefit would contributing this to wave be? Doesn't wave do a superset of this functionality already? (albeit with messier code) Seems (possibly) more useful for Wave to contribute its (federation) functionality to this or a fork of it. Then you would have a new pseudo-wave that does much of the same stuff, but with a much neater codebase (and mobile support) to build from. Alternatively if elements of this could replace waves code to simplify/neaten it that might be good...but at least from an outsiders perspective that seems rather hard.
Regarding the point earlier about rich text in json - wouldn't it be easier to use html encoding of styled text? To my knowledge html strings work in json just fine as long as a few things are escaped. Or isnt this possible with the OT method being used? ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 9 July 2014 17:06, 田传武 <i...@goodow.com> wrote: > inline > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > What are your plans with it? > > > > Not sure, may depend on the feedback. > > > > Are you considering to contribute this to Wave? > > > > I've read most of wave's code, but when I try to do big refactor, I am > baffled. >
