On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:28, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
". No need to discuss if somebody
has experience in GWT or not. IF you want to contribute, just DO it.
Checkout code, send patches. Its open to all."
I think the point was that having experience with GWT does
not necessarily give you the experience enough to make contributions.
I
could easily donate enough time to fix client side stuff....but last
time I
tried (which I confess was almost a year ago), I couldn't make head
nor
tails of how to put my knowledge of GWT to use. The shear massive
amount of
code and how it interrelates was just overwhelming.
Thus all I have ever contributed was a passage on the history of Wave.
I
have thus have no rights whatsoever to say were wave should go, or
how.
Thats indeed upto the real contributors.
But I do think its (probably) somewhat usefull for people like me and
Frank
R. to list our skills, and whats holding us back from contributing.
For me
personally its not the bureaucracy of Apache, but rather the
but the fact that I have to work out how to compile and run my own
server
even to make the most minor client change.
I have no specific objections to GitHub, I just dont think it will
help
either.
Perhaps if other "potential coders" gave reasons for their lack of
commits
it would help paint a picture of whats holding Wave back?
When i remember right (you could search the mailing archive for details
if you like)
the reasons are: no time. And so far no company is backing the
development of Wave.
As sad as it sounds, i tend to believe that code bases as huge as Wave
are hardly
maintained only in prime time.
I understood that your personal problem was not to know where to start.
This guidance of course needs to come from the current maintainers. Its
part of the apache
way to pick you up from a certain place and help you to grow into the
community.
Cheers
~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
On 29 November 2013 14:07, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 29 Nov 2013, at 13:50, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi Upayavira
Am 29.11.13 13:24, schrieb Upayavira:
The way open source communities such as this one work, the road map
needs to be defined by the people doing the work. It would be easy
for
some of us to come up with a cool roadmap, but if coders aren't
behind
it, it will be pointless effort.
That's true. I have just the feeling, that wave is a bit loost in
space.
I don't talk about a long time roadmap. I talk about a short
roadmap, from
release to release.
We have had a roadmap. It was simple: push out the next release.
Even for release checking and voting were hardly people available.
Ali Lown put a lot of time into the RC and got only less responses.
To
less.
At the same time a lot of people showed up here and discussed
potential
options for future directions of Wave.
When the dust settled the discussions had some kind of a consens but
(almost?) nobody put in actual code.
More than people discussing the future Wave needs people creating the
future - writing code.
Everybody on this list can easily check out the codebase and send
back
patches. No need to discuss if somebody
has experience in GWT or not. IF you want to contribute, just DO it.
Checkout code, send patches. Its open to all.
If folks are interested in coding Wave, whether at Apache or
elsewhere,
I'd encourage them to jump in and start suggesting where they think
it
should go.
I just want to say, that in my point of view, the Apache Structure
is not
the problem. I beleve a move to GitHub will not help for the long
term. For
my point of view, it's the wrong way to adress the problem.
The incubator has a specific goal: create a community around a
product
which is able to self govern.
Wave has not managed to build up a community since 2010-12-04. So far
there are many interested and curious people but nobody
actually works on the project.
With discussing the end of incubation i don't want to solve the
actual
problem of this project. Actually I can't.
The people around this project need to that.
The incubator is a complicated environment with many rules. With
going out
of the incubator this project would have to follow less rules.
Patches can
be accepted more easily (github is easier than the ASF in that
perspective).
I have no problem with leaving Wave a little longer here. But so far
I
don't see any sense in doing so as nothing happens here.
And I say this even when I like Wave and with deep respect to the few
people who actually contributed in the past.
Cheers
Christian
Greetings Raphael
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB