El 12/06/13 23:36, Thomas Wrobel escribió: > -1 for moving away from GWT. Gwt really does make heavily optimized > Javascript - you would be hard pressed to beat it by hand written > Javascript in all but small projects. Gwt starts fairly big for small > things, but scales *very* well. The fact that the current Client is a > bit heavy and messy isn't really gwts fault, imho. > > Gwt *is* just HTML5 + JS at the end of the day. Its simply an > alternative route to make it that saves a fair bit of work. Its > certainly allowed my small company to make a few web apps that we > wouldn't have had the resources to do directly in Javascript. > > That said, in order to enable a wide range of clients (not all web > based), eventually the advantage of directly sharing code between > client and server directly will vanish anyway. The reference client > and server will need to be completely separate entities code wise. > > Also, on a more personally level, I can help with gwt clients so you > will get a extra coder ;)
I totally agree also. BR, Vicente
