According to http://incubator.apache.org/wave/people.html Joseph Gentle is
listed as committer.

2011/7/8 Joseph Gentle <jose...@gmail.com>

> Heh - that looks like sharejs:
> https://github.com/josephg/ShareJS/
>
> I don't have a committee, but I've got OT-based syncronization of
> arbitrary JSON objects working. So you can write web apps and keep
> complex data structures synced up.
>
> There's a lot of little OT projects popping up at the moment. I don't
> think you're alone in fleeing from fedone's code base.
>
> -J
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Rohit Rai <rohitb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I haven't been able to invest much time on wave... found it the code too
> > cumbersome to work with... but thats a long rant I won't bother with.
> >
> > I just keep tabs on the development of the project. I was only interested
> in
> > the OT part of it and it was not documented and lack of documented
> > client/server protocol didn't help! GWT was the final deal breaker :D
> >
> > But when I left wave for and started looking for something else, I found
> > many things on the way... but the one that took my attention was
> > http://opencoweb.org/
> >
> > An OT framework, both for Python and Java with a lot of documentation and
> a
> > well defined Javascript client API and a proper documented client/server
> API
> > based on Bauyex.
> >
> > I hope it can help to establish a good client server protocol base for
> > others too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit
> >
> > The diamond cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected
> without
> > trials
> > http://mytechrantings.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I wondered if there was any interest again in helping push forward a
> >> stable client/server protocol for wiab?
> >>
> >> A few weeks back there was a thread started
> >> (
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201106.mbox/thread
> >> ),
> >> which then developed into a interesting discussion on protocols for
> >> wave (and wave-like) systems in general.
> >>
> >> However, the original intention (at least, from my perspective) of
> >> trying to push for a simple c/s interface for wiab...allowing anyone
> >> to write a client and connect to any standard wiab server.....seemed
> >> to have been lost.
> >> So I wondered if anyone was up for trying to work on it? I'm willing
> >> to help out as much as I can - although I'm mostly a java client
> >> coder, with little knowledge of the inner code of wiab. I could mock
> >> up basic clients to test the protocol with a lot easier then making
> >> wiab modifications. However, in either case, I'm willing to learn and
> >> put in the time if it means getting this functionality added.
> >>
> >> I'm assuming any c/s for wiab will be still based around there proposal
> >> here;
> >>
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
> >>
> >> -Thomas Wrobel
> >> arwave.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ~~~~~~
> >> Reviews of anything, by anyone;
> >> www.rateoholic.co.uk
> >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to