I agree with Yuri Z On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I actually don't think that federation should be priority for release 1.0. > Let's make the service usable on one domain first. The poll at > http://waveinabox.net/#waveinabox.net/w+GMv_qRbT0zA highlights the most > urgent issues I think. Of course of those we should prefer those that add > more value per effort. > So I think the ver. 1.0 should include: > 1. No critical bugs. > 2. Basic user profiles (images and nick names). > 3. Attachments. > > 2011/4/22 Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> > > > IMHO federation is a must. And obviously bug > > 252<http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=252>needs > > to be fixed. > > --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 21:47, James Purser <jamesrpur...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Okay, we need to start looking at what we think would make a good 1.0 > > > Release. > > > > > > To this end I'm going to start the ball rolling by asking that people > > > prioritise their particular list of bugs, features and nice to haves so > > > that > > > we can start discussing what we can fit into 1.0 and what can wait. > > > > > > I don't think we should start talking time frames until we have an > agreed > > > list of 1.0 settings. > > > > > > -- > > > James Purser > > > Collaborynth > > > http://collaborynth.com.au > > > Mob: +61 406 576 553 > > > Wave: ja...@collaborynth.com.au > > > > > >
