I actually don't think that federation should be priority for release 1.0. Let's make the service usable on one domain first. The poll at http://waveinabox.net/#waveinabox.net/w+GMv_qRbT0zA highlights the most urgent issues I think. Of course of those we should prefer those that add more value per effort. So I think the ver. 1.0 should include: 1. No critical bugs. 2. Basic user profiles (images and nick names). 3. Attachments.
2011/4/22 Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> > IMHO federation is a must. And obviously bug > 252<http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=252>needs > to be fixed. > --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 21:47, James Purser <jamesrpur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Okay, we need to start looking at what we think would make a good 1.0 > > Release. > > > > To this end I'm going to start the ball rolling by asking that people > > prioritise their particular list of bugs, features and nice to haves so > > that > > we can start discussing what we can fit into 1.0 and what can wait. > > > > I don't think we should start talking time frames until we have an agreed > > list of 1.0 settings. > > > > -- > > James Purser > > Collaborynth > > http://collaborynth.com.au > > Mob: +61 406 576 553 > > Wave: ja...@collaborynth.com.au > > >
