Dear all,
I was trying to test the performance of the VPP Host Stack, compared to the
one of the Linux kernel TCP/IP stack.
In particular, I was testing the TestProxy application [1] and compare it
with the simpleproxy application available at this URL [2].

My setup is composed of a server1, which runs the VPP test proxy
application attached to two physical interfaces (dual-port Intel
XL710 40GbE NIC). The application listens to TCP traffic on a given
IP1:port1 (interface 1) and forwards it to a "backend" server listening on
another IP2:port2 (interface 2).
Another server2 (same NIC) is running both an iperf3 client, which sends
traffic to the proxy at IP1:port1 and an iperf3 server, which receives
traffic on IP2:port2. Both iperf3 client and servers are running in two
different netns on server2 [3].
The VPP startup configuration that I used is the following [4].

The configuration works fine, however, these are the results that I got:
VPP Test Proxy (VPP) - 1.50 Gbits/sec
Simpleproxy (Linux kernel) - 9.39 Gbits/sec

I am wondering if there is something wrong with my setup/configuration, I
am quite new to VPP.

Thank you in advance.
Sebastiano

[1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack/TestProxy
[2] https://github.com/vzaliva/simpleproxy
[3] https://gist.github.com/sebymiano/0ff74ed0ec2805591fca7cd688b805d9
[4] https://gist.github.com/sebymiano/f75c0f4d506fbf722cb2358b1deaa250
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17017): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17017
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75706142/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to