This is a pretty good summary of various suggestions for replacement terms:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-team-approves-new-terminology-bans-terms-like-blacklist-and-slave/ Ed On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jerome Tollet via lists.fd.io <jtollet= cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > Hi Steven, > Please note that per this proposition, https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/4/229, > slave must be avoided but master can be kept. > Maybe master/member or master/secondary could be options too. > Jerome > > Le 14/07/2020 18:32, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de steven luong via > lists.fd.io » <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de sluong=cisco....@lists.fd.io> > a écrit : > > I am in the process of pushing a patch to replace master/slave with > aggregator/member for the bonding. > > Steven > > On 7/13/20, 4:44 AM, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Dave Barach > via lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of dbarach= > cisco....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > +1, especially since our next release will be supported for a > year, and API name changes are involved... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 6:01 AM > To: Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com>; Stephen Hemminger < > step...@networkplumber.org>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; t...@lists.fd.io; Ed > Warnicke (eaw) <e...@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature > > Hi Stephen, > > I agree, I don't think we should ignore this. > Ed - I suggest we table a discussion at the next FD.io TSC? > > Ray K > > On 09/07/2020 17:05, Dave Barach via lists.fd.io wrote: > > Looping in the technical steering committee... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of > Stephen Hemminger > > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:02 PM > > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > Subject: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature > > > > Is the VPP project addressing the use of master/slave > nomenclature in the code base, documentation and CLI? We are doing this > for DPDK and it would be good if the replacement wording used in DPDK > matched the wording used in FD.io projects. > > > > Particularly problematic is the use of master/slave in bonding. > > This seems to be a leftover from Linux, since none of the > commercial products use that terminology and it is not present in 802.1AX > standard. > > > > The IEEE and IETF are doing an across the board look at these > terms in standards. > > > > > > > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16950): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16950 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75503014/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
