Hi Stephen, I agree, I don't think we should ignore this. Ed - I suggest we table a discussion at the next FD.io TSC?
Ray K On 09/07/2020 17:05, Dave Barach via lists.fd.io wrote: > Looping in the technical steering committee... > > -----Original Message----- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:02 PM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature > > Is the VPP project addressing the use of master/slave nomenclature in the > code base, documentation and CLI? We are doing this for DPDK and it would be > good if the replacement wording used in DPDK matched the wording used in > FD.io projects. > > Particularly problematic is the use of master/slave in bonding. > This seems to be a leftover from Linux, since none of the commercial products > use that terminology and it is not present in 802.1AX standard. > > The IEEE and IETF are doing an across the board look at these terms in > standards. > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16941): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16941 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/75399929/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
