Thanks Damjan. I will try that too.

A last question: I assume I can keep using the "make -C build-root
install-packages" if I pull your last patches. Am I right / wrong?


Thanks,
Marco

On 1/28/19 5:57 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
> 
> With this change, I'm able to compile VPP out of tarball produced by
> "make dist".
> 
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/17125/
> 
> 
>> On 28 Jan 2019, at 13:35, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
>> <dmarion=me....@lists.fd.io <mailto:dmarion=me....@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 28 Jan 2019, at 12:08, Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de
>>> <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there still a way to use the old infrastructure to build the code?
>>
>> No, that doesn't make sense.
>>
>>>
>>> Apparently, cmake works when used inside the GIT repo but fails to build
>>> when using the tarball generated via "make dist" (required indeed for
>>> downstream consumption).
>>
>> that should be easy fixable....
>>
>>>
>>> On 1/26/19 2:22 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here it is: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/17094
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ mkdir build-vpp stage
>>>>
>>>> $ git clone <dpdk git>
>>>>
>>>> $ cd dpdk
>>>>
>>>> $ cat << _EOF_ | patch -p1
>>>> diff --git a/config/common_base b/config/common_base
>>>> index d12ae98bc..42d6f53dd 100644
>>>> --- a/config/common_base
>>>> +++ b/config/common_base
>>>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_STRICT_ALIGN=n
>>>>  #
>>>>  # Compile to share library
>>>>  #
>>>> -CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=n
>>>> +CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y
>>>>
>>>>  #
>>>>  # Use newest code breaking previous ABI
>>>> _EOF_
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ make -j install T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc DESTDIR=../stage
>>>>
>>>> $ cd ../build-vpp
>>>>
>>>> $ cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH:PATH=$PWD/../stage /path/to/vpp/src
>>>>
>>>> $ ninja
>>>>
>>>> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../stage/lib ldd lib/vpp_plugins/dpdk_plugin.so
>>>> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe2a3b7000)
>>>> librte_cryptodev.so.5.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_cryptodev.so.5.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1fa0000)
>>>> librte_eal.so.9.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_eal.so.9.1 (0x00007fd5e1ed1000)
>>>> librte_ethdev.so.11.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_ethdev.so.11.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1e30000)
>>>> librte_mbuf.so.4.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_mbuf.so.4.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1e28000)
>>>> librte_mempool.so.5.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_mempool.so.5.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1e1f000)
>>>> librte_pmd_bond.so.2.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_pmd_bond.so.2.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1dfe000)
>>>> librte_ring.so.2.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_ring.so.2.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1df9000)
>>>> librte_sched.so.1.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_sched.so.1.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1ded000)
>>>> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fd5e1be9000)
>>>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fd5e211d000)
>>>> librte_kvargs.so.1.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_kvargs.so.1.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1be4000)
>>>> libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fd5e1bdc000)
>>>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
>>>> (0x00007fd5e1bbb000)
>>>> librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007fd5e1bb1000)
>>>> libnuma.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnuma.so.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e19a6000)
>>>> librte_cmdline.so.2.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_cmdline.so.2.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e199a000)
>>>> librte_pci.so.1.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_pci.so.1.1 (0x00007fd5e1993000)
>>>> librte_bus_vdev.so.2.1 => ../stage/lib/librte_bus_vdev.so.2.1
>>>> (0x00007fd5e198c000)
>>>> libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fd5e17ff000)
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Damjan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 25 Jan 2019, at 18:03, Kinsella, Ray <ray.kinse...@intel.com
>>>>> <mailto:ray.kinse...@intel.com>
>>>>> <mailto:ray.kinse...@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried doing this recently and it barfed.
>>>>> How did you get it working?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ray K
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>>>>>> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
>>>>>> [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Marco
>>>>>> Varlese
>>>>>> Sent: Friday 25 January 2019 12:38
>>>>>> To: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com
>>>>>> <mailto:dmar...@me.com> <mailto:dmar...@me.com>>
>>>>>> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>>>>>> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] How do I get the "dpdk-shared" in VPP ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never mind... I did find the issue. All good ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Damjan!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/25/19 1:26 PM, Marco Varlese wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/25/19 11:14 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 25 Jan 2019, at 10:49, Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Damjan,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/24/19 10:46 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In theory like any other cmake project:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> $ mkdir build
>>>>>>>>>> $ cd build
>>>>>>>>>> $ cmake /path/to/vpp/src <opt args> $ make $ make install
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, not sure if I explained myself in the right way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem today is that I cannot find a way to tell VPP _not_ to
>>>>>>>>> download the dpdk tarball, uncompress it, build it and then link
>>>>>>>>> against it...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is exactly what I described above....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does the above help in that regard?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It helps as cmake doesn't download dpdk or other libs. It is
>>>>>>>> downloaded by bunch of makefiles outside of src/.
>>>>>>>> If you don't need such service from those Makefiles, don''t use
>>>>>>>> them..
>>>>>>> OK, so I did try your suggestion but in that case the DPDK plugin
>>>>>>> doesn't get built at all and the build procedure doesn't even get to
>>>>>>> the point of looking for a DPDK library (whether statically or
>>>>>>> dynamically linked).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In practice probably few lines should be modified in
>>>>>>>>>> src/plugins/dodkCMakeLists.txt to enable linking with shared libs,
>>>>>>>>>> as today we do static...
>>>>>>>>> So the shared-lib support was removed when moving to cmake I
>>>>>>>>> suppose.
>>>>>>>>> Was that intentional or just a miss?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it was intentional miss :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Damjan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> View/Reply Online (#12008):
>>>>>>> https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12008
>>>>>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29529767/675056
>>>>>>> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
>>>>>>> <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io>
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
>>>>>>>  [mvarl...@suse.de <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>]
>>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marco Varlese, Architect Developer Technologies, SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX
>>>>>> GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
>>>>>> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Damjan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>>>
>>>> View/Reply Online (#12023): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12023
>>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29529767/675056
>>>> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
>>>> <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io>
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [mvarl...@suse.de
>>>> <mailto:mvarl...@suse.de>]
>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Marco Varlese, Architect Developer Technologies, SUSE Labs
>>> SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
>>> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
>>
>> -- 
>> Damjan
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>
>> View/Reply Online (#12027): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12027
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29529767/675642
>> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io>
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [dmar...@me.com
>> <mailto:dmar...@me.com>]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> 
> View/Reply Online (#12029): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12029
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29529767/675056
> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [mvarl...@suse.de]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 

-- 
Marco Varlese, Architect Developer Technologies, SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg        

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12033): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12033
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29529767/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to