Hi Jon, I’ve updated nat_show_config_reply https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/14411/, hope it is all here now
Matus From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:45 AM To: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Endless NAT Questions I think nat_show_config_reply should be augmented with some fields reflecting newer features. You are correct deterministic and endpoint-dependent are mutually exclusive. Matus From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of Jon Loeliger Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10:39 PM To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> Subject: [vpp-dev] Endless NAT Questions Matus, Should the nat_show_config_reply structure be augmented to have the (newer) fields added to it? I'm thinking specifically about: - the nat64_* values - the dpo selection, - the dslite values, - the endpoint-dependent indication. Also, it looks like "deterministic" and "endpoint-dependent" are mutually exclusive. Is that correct? Thanks, jdl
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10251): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10251 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24537787/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
