I think nat_show_config_reply should be augmented with some fields reflecting
newer features.
You are correct deterministic and endpoint-dependent are mutually exclusive.
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Jon Loeliger
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10:39 PM
To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: [vpp-dev] Endless NAT Questions
Matus,
Should the nat_show_config_reply structure be augmented
to have the (newer) fields added to it?
I'm thinking specifically about:
- the nat64_* values
- the dpo selection,
- the dslite values,
- the endpoint-dependent indication.
Also, it looks like "deterministic" and "endpoint-dependent" are
mutually exclusive. Is that correct?
Thanks,
jdl
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#10178): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10178
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24537787/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
