Hi Natalie, Who requested that?
Thanks, -- Damjan > On 16 May 2018, at 15:33, Natalie Samsonov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Damjan, > > As I understood, it was a request to use DPDK plugin with all platforms and I > was asked to upstream Marvell DPDK plugin. > > Best Regards, > Natalie > > From: Damjan Marion [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 16:03 > To: Natalie Samsonov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: Tina Tsou <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Maen Suleiman > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [vpp-dev] Marvell's AI from last call > > External Email > > Dear Natalie, > > What is the point of using DPDK marvel driver (which is actually just a > wrapper around musdk) if we already have native musdk support in vpp? > -- > Damjan > > > On 15 May 2018, at 08:48, Natalie Samsonov <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > 1. We are working now on upstreaming Marvell’s PMD support in VPP DPDK > plugin. > I’m attaching the patch as well in case you want play with it. > 2. Regarding the L3FWD performance difference between MUSDK and DPDK, > currently we don’t have numbers with VPP L3FW. > We only have the numbers with two different applications. One is our own > L3FW application running on top of MUSDK and other is a standard DPDL L3FWD > application, so it’s not a fair comparison. > > Best Regards, > Natalie Samsonov > > > > <0001-plugins-dpdk-Add-support-for-net_mrvl-dpdk-driver.patch>
