I jumped the gun on this because I will be busy for the next few days. I
uploaded the poster that I will be presenting:

THIS IS THE POSTER FOR: Mizuno, T. *Method of controlling a
chemically-induced nuclear reaction in metal nanoparticles*. in *ICCF18
Conference*. 2013. University of Missouri.

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTposterform.pdf

I am presenting this because Mizuno cannot attend. I hope to upload a
preprint of the actual paper on the day the conference starts. The link
will be:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTmethodofco.pdf

(A placeholder file is there now.)



This will be a preprint version. After the conference we may be able to add
details to this paper in time for the Proceedings submission. If we do, I
will upload a new version of this.

This poster is written by me. The paper is mainly translated.

I should explain that I have not actually seen this experiment in person. I
spent a few weeks observing Mizuno's previous aqueous glow discharge
experiments, but I have not seen this version. I have a great of
information about it in Japanese, and many photographs. I have been working
through this material for the past month, so think I have a feel for it. It
would have been easier if I had spent a week in Sapporo.

Naturally, Mizuno has reviewed my translation of the paper and the poster.

It is never easy understanding an experiment. I spent hours poking through
the spreadsheets and graphs, drawing lines on them and trying to work out
what's what. I find is amusing when I tell some skeptic to read McKubre's
paper and an hour later he writes back: "That's all wrong! I see a dozen
mistakes!" No, you don't. Give yourself a couple of hours a day for a week
and maybe you will begin to appreciate what McKubre has done.

Needless to say, it is about a hundred times easier to understand an
experiment than it is to *do* one. All those confusing complications are
there for a reason.

- Jed

Reply via email to