Francis, I agree for the most part. I think the Sun's Corona is made up of strings of this vacuum energy created as she accelerates, collides and collapses hydrogen around her nucleus. I think she can pack a lot of energy into the vacuum side of that equation, which ends up being our quantum gravity field as it streams towards us. The highly energetic particles/strings from solar flare/CME upsets orbit into our atmosphere and trigger our severe weather as they decay over months in our jet streams, pulling a vacuum, condensing water vapor into rain, snow and ice and causing electromagnetic disturbances along their path through and around the Earth. It is a 95% vacuum/particle Universe and we are 5% window dressing with particles streaming through and decaying us. Humans should measure their ages in half-lives...
It snows CO2 on Mars, which is a refrigerant on Earth and they also have tornadoes, so we know they are not caused from air/water vapor. Looks like they already made a movie about my theory, complete with sinkholes and Earthquakes. I hear it is hilarious. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1245492/ Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Very possible, The broadened emissions are from the hydrino > contribution, the hydrogen’s spatial motion has already been reduced by > nano confinement and then longer vacuum wavelengths are suddenly suppressed > by the local geometry. My posit is that these fractional orbits are > negative inertial frames where spatial motion is already effectively zero > but the quotient of V^2/C^2 is further reduced because the unit of time is > suppressed proportional to the vacuum wavelengths. Naudt’s paper called it > relativistic hydrogen but perhaps inverse relativistic would have been more > appropriate because from our perspective the hydrogen in a cavity ages > faster while hydrogen ejected from the suns corona ages slower. As in any > relativistic frame the local observers are unaware of time dilation but > radiation emitted from f/h at the normal frequency in a negative inertial > frame will translate to longer wavelengths as dilation reduces and orbits > becomes less fractional. The frequency appears lower when we observe it in > our macro inertial frame since space time has stretched from the negative > inertial frame where the radiation originated. That’s my story and I’m > sticking to it :_) > Fran > _____________________________________________ > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 12:41 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Venus - high and dry - why ? > > > > As illogical as it may sound on first blush, can any electrically powered > thermal device (looking pretty much like a tube furnace) function in such a > way so as to convert a hot blackbody surface into a cooler (but still quite > hot) coherent infrared interior … with superradiant resonance at 15 THz? > > To make it a little clearer where this suggestion is going - imagine a > stainless steel tube sealed at both ends, so as to operate simply as a > cavity resonator for unfocused infrared radiation (instead of operating as > a laser emission tube). Imagine it is a version of a gas-phase optically > pumped non-focused IR laser -- in which the gas is a hydride, perhaps KH, > operating at partial vacuum. Here is a predecessor design. > > * > http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006553 > *<http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1006553> > > The optical pumping mechanism is supplied by hotter IR radiation from a > superabsorbent re-emitter, such as a silicon-carbide exterior tube, with > the inner stainless tube centered with minimal contact. That > silicon-carbide superabsorbent re-emitter tube is itself heated by a > resistence heater at over 800 C. It remains hotter at its peak temperature > than the interior tube at 447 C because the interior tube is > absorbing/re-emitting predominantly at 15 THz or 20 micron radiation. > > Thus the net effect is that the inner superradiant tube emits extremely > intense radiation but with a lower peak. This is similar to Randell Mills > “emission-line broadening” but in IR. > > These dynamics would result in a skewed emission curve for the external > tube as well. Emission line broadening allows massively more net energy to > be emitted from a source at a lower effective peak temperature – compared > to blackbody assumptions. Thus the HotCat could be even more energetic than > imagined, based on the technique used to measure it – which assumed no line > broadening > > Possible, or no? > > Jones > > > > > > >
