A better reference:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110906144558.htm


On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> How bacteria stabilize nuclear waste:
>
>
> http://news.discovery.com/tech/biotechnology/how-bacteria-clean-up-nuclear-waste-110909.htm
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The LENR energy source has a down side. It is not a source of free energy
>> to a biological system. The emitted radiation would be obviously harmful.
>> Consequently, the source would be only employed when this is the only way
>> to avoid death. Fortunately, evolution has found better ways to get energy.
>> Nevertheless, the energy source of all life-forms has not been identified.
>>  I can imagine that some single-cell organisms use fusion and transmutation
>> as sources of energy, but these are rare and generally occupy environments
>> inaccessible to biologists where the easy sources of energy are not
>> available.
>>
>> In addition, what biologist would suggest that bacteria appear to be
>> causing a nuclear reaction without being able to show very strong evidence,
>> which is obviously not easy to get? You can now see the reaction to this
>> idea even in the face of strong evidence that the effect is real.
>>
>> You might ask why cockroaches are very immune to radiation? Why did
>> evolution give this protection unless they had to be defended from
>> radiation. Has anyone measured the exact energy source used by a cockroach?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2013, at 4:15 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>>
>>  The subject say it all, really:  'Yet Another LENR "Miracle":  Evolution
>>> Didn't Find It'
>>>
>>> If an energy source as abundant and ubiquitous as LENR appears to be
>>> exists, why wouldn't evolution have found ways of creating the NAE (nuclear
>>> active environment)?  If you say "It did." then you have to explain why the
>>> manifest evolutionary advantages of such an energy source didn't cause it
>>> to become wide-spread enough to have baffled biochemists in the course of
>>> their analysis of metabolism.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to