You don't need new physics to explain cold fusion. Nor violate any statistical physics. You just need to look for ignored solution in the literature.
2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > No thanks. Why don't you just answer the question? It is pretty > straightforward. > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I wish Abd was here. Would you like to carry this conversation to his nVo? >> >> >> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> >>> Then let's get back to your original statement: "That's not good. It >>> violates the 2nd law of thermo." How is that not good? That's like >>> watching a rock hovering in the sky saying, "that violates the law of >>> gravity". There's nothing good nor bad about it. It's simply an >>> experimental result. >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I don't understand what you mean... >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There are theories that avoid the violation of the 2nd law. >>>>>> >>>>> ***Then as long as those theories can explain this experimental >>>>> result, everything is in good shape. Why would you say "That's not good"? >>>>> >>>>> This is an experimental finding, not a theory. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Rocha >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's not good. It violates the 2nd law of thermo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***It is an experimental finding. Like Feynman says, experiment >>>>>>> trumps theory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
