There may be a condition imposed on all who depend on LENR licensing or any product availability regarding their corporate hiring practices. A lie detector test should be a requirement of employment for their institution which asks the critical question: “Do you or have you ever opposed the idea of LENR to have ever put LENR at a disadvantage in science.”
As a next step, all positive responses will be reviewed rigorously before the holy office of the LENR inquisition for doctrinal purity to assess the danger to the best interests of LENR. Due to his long experience, William Beaty may be the best qualified to be the first pontiff of the first ecclesiastical tribunal whose motto is: quoniam punitio non refertur primo & per se in correctionem & bonum eius qui punitur, sed in bonum publicum ut alij terreantur, & a malis committendis avocentur. For punishment does not take place primarily and per se for the correction and good of the person punished, but for the public good in order that others may become terrified and weaned away from the evils they would commit. On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > when can I find something that i can oppose to those who say I make > libelous claims ? > > even on you letter to nature to correct Caltech paper, I find nothing else > instance of bad science, not a general procedure... > > about Nuremberg idea, I defend the principle of reasonable specific > punishment, yet protection of the public... just fired and ridiculed. no > death penalty, yet technically a serial guinner have less blood on his > hand.... > > but as you say it will not be so, on the opposite. > Someone said to me that Vengeance is done only on the Innocent. > > Nassim Nicholas Taleb in Antifragile explain that history is rewritten by > the losers and that typically they say that academics have invented all, > and hide the garage tinkerers and other practitioners... And even if not > stealing property they transform hardcord tinkererd into ethereal theorist. > Taleb even start to see that on his job, > > I start to understand what happened with LENR, AGW, Finance, Software > Engineering... same scheme... > > > > 2013/6/2 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > >> Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ok, so nothing official . . . >>> >> >> It is official. All of the major journals have a clear policy of >> rejecting cold fusion papers out of hand. All mass media newspapers and >> magazines, except CBS and Forbes, have made it their policy to publish >> attacks on cold fusion researchers without allowing a defense by the >> accused. >> >>
