when can I find something that i can oppose to those who say I make libelous claims ?
even on you letter to nature to correct Caltech paper, I find nothing else instance of bad science, not a general procedure... about Nuremberg idea, I defend the principle of reasonable specific punishment, yet protection of the public... just fired and ridiculed. no death penalty, yet technically a serial guinner have less blood on his hand.... but as you say it will not be so, on the opposite. Someone said to me that Vengeance is done only on the Innocent. Nassim Nicholas Taleb in Antifragile explain that history is rewritten by the losers and that typically they say that academics have invented all, and hide the garage tinkerers and other practitioners... And even if not stealing property they transform hardcord tinkererd into ethereal theorist. Taleb even start to see that on his job, I start to understand what happened with LENR, AGW, Finance, Software Engineering... same scheme... 2013/6/2 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, so nothing official . . . >> > > It is official. All of the major journals have a clear policy of rejecting > cold fusion papers out of hand. All mass media newspapers and magazines, > except CBS and Forbes, have made it their policy to publish attacks on cold > fusion researchers without allowing a defense by the accused. > >
