Dear Dave, Let the facts speak, I think we cannot compare and or judge such new technologies when we (you and I) have so lmited information about those technologies. Let's Rossi and DGT develop their generators. In my terminology both are on the way from enhanced excess heat to a controlled commercial energy source- and it is not an easy way. They use different approaches and let's the faster and better one arrive first but the energy market is insatiable. I am using speculation with extreme care
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:21 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter, > > You have done an excellent job of listing the main issues that will need > attention. At this point we do not have sufficient information about the > actual processes occurring and a good theory of how the energy is > released. Until that occurs it will take a lot of empirical testing which > seems to be what the two camps are doing. > > It would appear that DGT has a process that is fuel starved for control > much like an ICE which has been considered an analogy in recent posts. > This technique may well result in a large COP which has advantages. I have > to wonder whether or not damage is done to the active materials by the > discharges. If this happens then life of service may be limited. Also, I > suspect that the generation of the high voltages used for the process pose > other problems as well. > > The basic design of Rossi's ECAT appears to be simple in structure which > offers other advantages. The manufacturing cost should be low in his case, > at least for the configuration that we have seen. My biggest concern is > the limitation of COP and the difficulty of maintaining control. > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > To: VORTEX <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Jun 1, 2013 9:35 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion > > OK, David I have the impression you are an experienced > man, what else can be done than testing the duration, solve > the material problems, and improve the system? And this was done > and will be continued in the professional way. Est modus in rebus. > Peter > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It has been apparent to me for a long time that DGT uses a different >> method for generation of heat than does Rossi. Both techniques appear to >> work. >> >> The main question is whether or not one of the processes has a >> significantly long life span before internal damage makes it require >> maintenance. Of course the cost of manufacturing is important as well. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vorl Bek <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sat, Jun 1, 2013 7:28 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion >> >> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:52:44 -0400 >> Ron Kita <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Greeting Vortex-L >> > >> > Boring.... >> > http://www.lenrnews.eu/ >> >> Are you kidding? This blows Rossi out of the water. >> >> [quote] >> The good-news claim is that DGT can control their multi-stage >> dynamic process. We observed their fifth-generation apparatus being >> ramped up in minutes instead of taking hours or days to reach >> levels of heat output several times higher than equivalent energy >> input of electricity....All that's needed to stop the reactor from >> producing excess heat energy is to switch off those currents that >> create plasma. >> [/quote] >> >> No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense. >> >> This sounds like the real deal. >> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
