In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:34:37 +0000: Hi Fran,
I think we are just going to have to agree to disagree. ;) >Robin, > I agree most of LENR is mediated by the same force "responsible" for > hydrinos but I would disagree that hydrinos are the mediating force, >In Jan Naudt's relativistic interpretation of Mill's hydrino only the hydrogen >being ejected from the corona has a near enough velocity to C to equate to >significantly fractional hydrogen [hydrino]... Or as I infer from his paper, >occurs in a stationary catalyst/nano powder which exposes a gas to Casimir >geometry for it to also become relativistic [equivalence]. In both cases it >remains just hydrogen from the perspective of a tiny local observer in the >same inertial frame as the hydrogen.... Like the dilation experienced by an >object approaching C, I am convinced that hydrogen confined inside a nickel >lattice with Casimir geometry also becomes dilated, it perceives the outside >world as having a ratio of V^2/C^2 equivalent to the ratio seen by a near >luminal object just like the hydrogen being ejected from the corona. The >confined gas requires suppression of C^2 instead of increasing V^2 to modify >the dilation ratio, a sort of negative perspective from the nominal baseline >where we >tend to think of open space and lack of any spatial velocity as the "zero" >point for relativistic consideration.. I am positing that Casimir geometry >suppresses C instead of compressing V... making V^2/C^2 suddenly a dynamic >value slewing wildly with the slightest motion of gas relative to Casimir >geometry but in a negative direction lower than that zero point we normally >self impose. It is the tiny observer inside the cavity that perceives us >outside the cavity as slowing down in time in the same way we perceive the >near C object as slowing down.[or from our perspective reactions inside the >cavity are accelerated by these rapid changes in dilation factor] >Regards >Fran > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:12 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight... > >In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:10 +0100: >Hi, > >IMO, Mills is not LENR. It is what he says it is. Hydrinos. However I suspect >that most of LENR is mediated by Hydrinos too.... ;) > > >>Hi, I hijack a little that thread to ask you all, what are your various >>opinion on their claimed technology of LENR to electricity direct >>conversion (CIHT). >> >>I don't see any other paper or lab results that are similar. >>Anomalous heat, transmutation, and radiations are quite validated , but >>device producing electricity are not yet seen... >> >>The claim of validation are quite individual reports of quick testing... >> >>what are your opinions. >> >>tnaks in advance for your informations and opinions. >[snip] >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
