Do you suppose all of those climate models take into account the energy released to Earth through natural Beta decay and LENR reactions from billions of tons of neutrinos and other dark matter stuff? NOT. It also does not take into account what happens when a large dark matter nucleus from a WIMP(hurricane) or comet nuclei sucks the energy from our world back to a dark/vacuum energy state. CO2 is just fluff. Civilizations in the past have thrived as the Earth has warmed, it is not until the impact event of multiple comet nuclei or major solar storms that we are thrown back into an ice age. In this day in age, even If we are smart enough to survive the ice age event, which is doubtful, our fission reactor meltdowns will most likely insure we are fried.
Best we spread our DNA off this rock ASAP and pay close attention to those crop circles letting us know when the dark stuff is going to hit us in the head. Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:06 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy, > > Check out the picture on the link below > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino > > If it happens in the atmosphere we call it a warm sunny day. > > If it happens in a void with hydrogen in the dark we gaze in amazement and > ask for money. > > Go figure. > > Stewart > Darkmattersalot.com > > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Andy Findlay wrote: > >> I wasn't aware that hydrogen was capable of beta decay. >> Andy. >> >> On 27/11/12 23:03, ChemE Stewart wrote: >> >> If billions of neutrinos are flowing through all matter all of the time, >> if you pack enough hydrogen in a concentrated area you are bound to get a >> head on collision now or then leading to beta decay. Probably also leads to >> hydrogen embrittlement over time and maybe the gravitational acceleration >> we all experience when we stand on our dark matter nucleus planets... >> >> We humans are just the beta decay frosting on the cake. >> >> http://theta13.lbl.gov/neutrinos_universe/neutrinos_01.html >> >> Stewart >> Darkmattersalot.com >> >> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Andy Findlay wrote: >> >>> Does anybody know of a sensible counter-argument (or maybe even a peer >>> reviewed refutation) to the idea that the anomalous heat of >>> cold-fusion/LENR might just be due to a Wigner-(like)-Effect? >>> >>> I had never heard of the Wigner >>> Effect<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_effect>until a couple of days >>> ago when I was reading about the Windscale >>> fire <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire> (sorry about the use >>> of Wikipedia links). >>> >>> It got me thinking about whether the documented swelling of palladium >>> during loading could lead to a similar Wigner (like) Effect deformation of >>> the palladium lattice which could then release stored energy abruptly - as >>> happened in the graphite moderators in the Windscale fire. >>> >>> Following up on this, I found Douglas R.O. Morrison's Cold Fusion >>> News<http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/DROM/14.shtml>article on >>> NETwhich includes the following paragraph: >>> >>> "Prof. Bockris of Texas A&M give a talk entitled "Seven Chemical >>> Explanations of the Fleischmann-Pons effect" where he estimated the heat >>> excess produced but always got values much less than the early claims of >>> F-P and of Huggins of the order of 10 Watts - the highest he calculated was >>> 0.9 W for the Pauling suggestion of PdH2 formation. He was asked about the >>> Wigner effect, but had not considered it* [ comment - this is a >>> favourite explanation of many people. It was responsible for a large >>> release of radioactivity in about 1957 at Windscale - the neutrons absorbed >>> by the graphite had stored a lot of energy in the graphite by changing its >>> structure and the subsequent release of this energy caused the trouble. It >>> had previously been predicted by Wigner. Similarly the absorption of >>> hydrogen or of deuterium by palladium causes the palladium to swell and >>> this stores a lot of energy in the cathode. When the loading stops (e.g. >>> the current is switched off or the level of the electrolyte falls and >>> exposes part of the cathode), then this Wigner energy can be released]." >>> >>> *Obviously I missed out on part of the cold fusion story. >>> >>> So, counter-arguments? >>> >>> Andy. >>> >> >>
