The COP went up!!! 2012/10/12 Bruno Santos <[email protected]>
> Yet another "Rossi said"... > > It is getting a little bit repetitive. > > > 2012/10/12 Craig Haynie <[email protected]> > >> "If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of powder is >> awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 )" >> >> This is correct. I neglected to subtract out the input power. >> >> Craig >> >> On 10/12/2012 01:21 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: >> > If average power over 228 hours is 14.337 KW, and the total charge is 20 >> > g, then shouldn't the power density be: >> > >> > 14337 / 20 = 716 watts/gm = 716 kw / kg >> > >> > Craig >> > >> > On 10/12/2012 01:15 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: >> >> Why Rossi is taking energy produced per weight as a power density ? In >> the >> >> report he says : >> >> >> >> "POWER DENSITY >> >> >> >> 163,4 MW*kg^-1 (onehundred sixtythree point four >> MWh >> >> per kg) >> >> (see the Ragone Plot at pag. 15 of the Penon >> Report >> >> attached)" >> >> >> >> He should have called that the energy density which has no meaning here >> >> cause there are still energy to release of its cylinder ... >> >> >> >> It seems, he is always confusing energy and power. With its kWh/h unity >> >> which for means nothing physical. >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 19:06 >> >>> To: '[email protected]' >> >>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 >> >>> >> >>> If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of >> >>> powder is awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 ) >> >>> >> >>> Celani's wire is around ~70 W/g >> >>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 18:37 >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>> Subject: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-h >> >>>> ot-cat-report/ >> >>>> >> >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
