Yet another "Rossi said"... It is getting a little bit repetitive.
2012/10/12 Craig Haynie <[email protected]> > "If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of powder is > awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 )" > > This is correct. I neglected to subtract out the input power. > > Craig > > On 10/12/2012 01:21 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: > > If average power over 228 hours is 14.337 KW, and the total charge is 20 > > g, then shouldn't the power density be: > > > > 14337 / 20 = 716 watts/gm = 716 kw / kg > > > > Craig > > > > On 10/12/2012 01:15 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote: > >> Why Rossi is taking energy produced per weight as a power density ? In > the > >> report he says : > >> > >> "POWER DENSITY > >> > >> 163,4 MW*kg^-1 (onehundred sixtythree point four > MWh > >> per kg) > >> (see the Ragone Plot at pag. 15 of the Penon Report > >> attached)" > >> > >> He should have called that the energy density which has no meaning here > >> cause there are still energy to release of its cylinder ... > >> > >> It seems, he is always confusing energy and power. With its kWh/h unity > >> which for means nothing physical. > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 19:06 > >>> To: '[email protected]' > >>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 > >>> > >>> If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of > >>> powder is awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 ) > >>> > >>> Celani's wire is around ~70 W/g > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 18:37 > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7 > >>>> > >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-h > >>>> ot-cat-report/ > >>>> > >
