Lou, This company has been the unquestioned leader in the sonofusion field for the past 13 years.
http://www.impulsedevices.com/ Unlike Nanospire and Stringham, they have a top notch lab, PhDs, patents, real results, peer reviewed publications - and manufactured and sold a working prototype reactor at one time. The problem is breakeven. No one can get close. Again - there are NO short lived isotopes, unless you consider tritium's 12 year half-life to be short. Most of LeClair's spiel is delusional. Jones -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Thanks, Jones, I agree all claims need to be viewed with skepticism until there is independent replication by competent, financially disinterested scientists. Possibly, most, or even all, results are due to measurement errors or misreporting - I really don't know. If Nanospire's or Stringham's claims are sound, they should reproducible. BTW, the General Fusion has conducted some recent experiments also, and found some positive (but inconclusive) evidence for sonofusion. If interested, see: "D-D FUSION NEUTRONS FROM A STRONG SPHERICAL SHOCK WAVE FOCUSED ON A DEUTERIUM BUBBLE IN WATER" http://www.slideserve.com/dallon/d-d-fusion-neutrons-from-a-strong-spherical -shock-wave-focused-on-a-deuterium-bubble-in-water The signal-to-noise level in LENR reporting is still way too low. Cheers, Lou Pagnucco Jones Beene wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > >> Nanospire report that the isotopes generated are short-lived. > Assuming their measurements are accurate, why should this be? > > It can't be true. > > Lou, to be generous - most interested observers who have looked into these > claims, consider LeClair and his partner to be on the level of >[...]
