Thank you. I've been following this for quite a while and have not seen anything mentioned about it. If I wouldn't have asked multiple times, it would have probably been ignored and never answered. You said you forgot about it. A good sign of a scam is distracting and delaying which is what Rossi's response looks like. I'm not saying it is a scam. Like I said, the only thing helping Rossi right now is Defkalion. I'll wait for their tests and form my opinion then. On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Robert Leguillon wrote:
> The question was eventually asked, and skirted on Rossi's > journal-of-nuclear-physics.com: > > Q: > Bill Conley > February 16th, 2012 at 10:27 AM > Mr. Rossi, > Several months ago you said that although your first 1MW plant client wished > to remain confidential, a second client was willing to be publicly identified > and we would hear about them soon. Several months have passed and we have > heard no more about this second client. Can you give us an update. We would > love to be able to hear the experience of a real E-Cat user, something that > we can only dream about at this point. > Thanks and best wishes on your very important work. > > A: > Andrea Rossi > February 17th, 2012 at 9:27 AM > Dear Bill Conley: > With the puppet snakes, the greek clowns and other vultures around I have to > protect our Customers from any kind of internet assault, so I have to be very > closed in this period. Our Customers are working in peace, we too, our > patents are going through, and when we will put our product in the massive > market, well protected by our patents and by very cheap prices, your dreams > to see an E-Cat working in your house will be reality. > In this moment I would just give free information to the hordes of wannabe > competitors. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=580#comments > > ________________________ > > > Just to be clear, there is no problem proposing the initial question on > vortex. Sometimes, everyone forgets the minutiae, and deadlines pass > unchallenged. I'd honestly forgotten about Rossi's claim to a "public > customer" until it resurfaced recently. > > /pulling out soapbox/ > It is asking the same question repeatedly, demanding an answer, that quickly > devolves into general sneering. Though it may not be obvious at first > glance, there is a wide spectrum from belief-to-skepticism here. Especially > with Rossi. Everyone weighs out the evidence on their own, and comes to > their own conclusion. More recently, some expect to "save everyone from mass > delusion", but fail the simple task of querying the vortex archive to see if > the issue has been previously addressed. > >
