The question was eventually asked, and skirted on Rossi's journal-of-nuclear-physics.com: Q:
Bill Conley February 16th, 2012 at 10:27 AM Mr. Rossi, Several months ago you said that although your first 1MW plant client wished to remain confidential, a second client was willing to be publicly identified and we would hear about them soon. Several months have passed and we have heard no more about this second client. Can you give us an update. We would love to be able to hear the experience of a real E-Cat user, something that we can only dream about at this point. Thanks and best wishes on your very important work. A: Andrea Rossi February 17th, 2012 at 9:27 AM Dear Bill Conley: With the puppet snakes, the greek clowns and other vultures around I have to protect our Customers from any kind of internet assault, so I have to be very closed in this period. Our Customers are working in peace, we too, our patents are going through, and when we will put our product in the massive market, well protected by our patents and by very cheap prices, your dreams to see an E-Cat working in your house will be reality. In this moment I would just give free information to the hordes of wannabe competitors. Warm Regards, A.R. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=580#comments ________________________ Just to be clear, there is no problem proposing the initial question on vortex. Sometimes, everyone forgets the minutiae, and deadlines pass unchallenged. I'd honestly forgotten about Rossi's claim to a "public customer" until it resurfaced recently. /pulling out soapbox/ It is asking the same question repeatedly, demanding an answer, that quickly devolves into general sneering. Though it may not be obvious at first glance, there is a wide spectrum from belief-to-skepticism here. Especially with Rossi. Everyone weighs out the evidence on their own, and comes to their own conclusion. More recently, some expect to "save everyone from mass delusion", but fail the simple task of querying the vortex archive to see if the issue has been previously addressed.
