If the helium levels are "what they should be" compared to the heat, that assumes some theory that correlates them. Which theory is that?
On Dec 27, 2011, at 12:24, Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> wrote: > It is not theory, it is experimental result. Go to: > > http://www.lenr-canr.org/ > > and enter "Miles helium" and "McKubre helium". > > > On Dec 27, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Charles Hope wrote: > >> How's that? According to what theory? >> >> >> >> On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:01, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Jouni Valkonen wrote: >>> >>>> If I have understood correctly, the correlation is meaningless, because >>>> there are orders of magnitude too tiny amounts of helium compared to >>>> observed heat. >>>> >>> >>> You do not understand correctly. The amounts of helium are right what they >>> should be compared to observed heat. Please read Miles or McKubre. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >> > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > >
