Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: So when did Levi authorize you to speak for him? >
That's what he said; take it or leave it. When did you look inside the machine? > The results in February cannot be trusted because of incorrect thermocouple > placement. > That can't be. A 5 deg C temperature difference is too small for that. The larger temperature difference might be affected by the position of the thermocouples. > Again, there is no physical evidence of two distinct configurations. > Yes, there is. That is what people who looked inside the machines say they saw. > Since Rossi is now committed to the design which we can see, there is no > incentive to be secretive on the one which does not matter – so why not show > the insides of the one tested in Jan/Feb? > He did show the insides. Levi and others say they saw the insides. Unless you have heard from someone who looked inside and saw a 50 ml cell, I think you have no basis for making these assertions. This seems to be the word of Levi et al. on one side, and you unsupported imagination on the other. Why should anyone believe you? - Jed
