Jones,
I am totally onboard with reason 2 and 3 you list below. For
reason 1 I had to go back to review spillover from your previous threads and
have to admit it
is a possibility but what would you recognize as the support structures in
Arata's nano Pd or Mills skeletal catalyst?
Regards
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
Fran,
Actually I think the many problems, as I understand what they (Moddel etc) have
done (incorrectly) and why they have not seen thermal gain with Casimir
cavities is three-fold:
1) Lack of a spillover catalyst (nickel alone is not sufficient). Spillover
is required for pycno to accumulate in cavities.
2) Lack of a trigger temperature - gain does not happen at ambient, even
with pycno.
3) Lack of phase-change at or near the trigger temperature.
All are needed, and they provided none of them, as I understand it.
Jones
Ø The above is why I remain a fence sitter on the Model-Haisch patent in that
I believe they need to create an asymmetry similar to the change in bond state
used by Moller in the MAHG and a control system to get the h1 deep into
fractional states then let it form molecules which nature will oppose escaping
and allow us to rectify "HUP" or "Zitterbewegung" whenever it pushes the
molecule toward escape and discounts the energy needed to disassociate.
