A new paper “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst system as a new Power 
Source” http://blacklightpower.com/papers/EngPower032610S.pdf reinforces 

my conviction that Mills and Haisch – Moddel are both very close but by 
refusing to incorporate components of each other’s theory are both still wrong. 
Mills new paper focuses on the difference between energy released in the 
hydrino state and the much lower energy required to convert the hydrides formed 
in the catalyst back to their initial form allowing the catalyst to work 
properly once again. Dr Mills was the one that inspired me to consider ashless 
chemistry but I appear to have taken it a step further by borrowing components 
of the Haisch Moddel theory involving Casimir effect and taping energy from 
ZPE. I think Mills is actually focused on “dissolving” a destructive by product 
that is “shorting” out the Casimir effect by forming whiskers across the 
cavities – the same problem the government is currently funding to prevent 
stiction in their latest nano endeavors. The ashless chemistry Mills should be 
focused on is powered by quantum forces that are antithetical to his GUT. These 
quantum forces are changes in Casimir effect that occur most dynamically with 
abrupt changes in geometry at the smallest scales like the pores in a skeletal 
catalyst or the Haish Moddel prototype (essentially a synthetic super 
catalyst). It is the these sudden changes in catalytic action that try to 
reform orbitals to new fractional values that disassociates molecular hydrogen 
reversing it back to atomic hydrogen numerous times before the thermal runaway 
caused the hydride reactions Mills is focused on in his paper. 



Haisch and Moddel make the same mistake in reverse, refusing to acknowledge 
that Mills is correct about the need for a chemical reaction to rectify the 
energy from the quantum effect. They seem to allow that the hydrogen must be 
disassociated to enter the cavity but then unbelievably think the f/h will 

Release energy as it transitions to smaller fractional states on the way into 
the cavity but be replenished globally by ZPE on the way out. Maybe it is 25 
years of Power R&D talking but you need a rectifier – a knot- a waveform will 
transition symmetrically into and out of the same conditions unless you MAKE 
the path asymmetrical. The h2 molecule does this naturally, We know you have to 
force it through a membrane or heat it to disassociate it to get it to load 
into a lattice or even penetrate significantly into the confines of a Casimir 
cavity. My thought is this molecular bond is our rectifier and it not only 
resists the initial change to a fractional orbit but if it forms a fractional 
molecule it will also resist change to a different fractional value inside the 
cavity. That is the asymmetrical path that 

Causes ashless chemistry –You still have gas law (think ac component riding 
atop Casimir bias) based on uncertainty principle driving those gas molecules 
around inside the cavity and when opposed by abrupt change in Casimir effect 
will disassociate so the atoms can change to the new appropriate fraction for 
the new local geometry. 

Regards 

Fran

Reply via email to