Chnge it if you think it is wrong. It is wrong because you don't change it:-) An auhoritarian source would remain wrong.
Oxygen is also scarce. Why? David On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > If you blow up the last chart you will see that there is/was CO2, but > less than expected. > > > > The wording is confusing. Instead of “lack” they should have said > “deficiency”, but after all it is only Wiki and not a bona fide authority > ;-) > > > > Brings to mind the programming pun “gigo” > > > > *From:* David Jonsson [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:21 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Vo]:Gas proportions at Antarctica different, no CO2 for > example > > > > I saw this on > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok,_Antarctica#Climate > > Details? What are the proportions? Only lack of CO2? > > Explanations? > > I have a guess one but I don't intend to hint. > > David >
