If you blow up the last chart you will see that there is/was CO2, but less than expected.
The wording is confusing. Instead of “lack” they should have said “deficiency”, but after all it is only Wiki and not a bona fide authority ;-) Brings to mind the programming pun “gigo” From: David Jonsson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Gas proportions at Antarctica different, no CO2 for example I saw this on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok,_Antarctica#Climate Details? What are the proportions? Only lack of CO2? Explanations? I have a guess one but I don't intend to hint. David
