Well Frank, such ideas have value only when they show why and how most
observed behaviors occur and how to make the behavior occur more
consistently and at higher levels. All theories I know about met only
a small fraction of this requirement. If you can have better success
in this requirement, your theory will have value.
Most theories are useful guides and do suggest useful approaches, but
the use of assumptions to allow the data to be fit, i.e. to allow a
claim to be made for predictions of behavior, greatly reduces the
value. If I understand your approach, you use conventional and
accepted theory to arrive at a new constant, which you assume is as
fundamental as Planck's constant. You claim that the logic associated
with this constant allows you to make novel predictions. You may be
right. However, I would like to know, based on your model, exactly
which kinds of atoms and how I need to arrange them in a solid or
living cell to cause a nuclear reaction to be initiated, i.e. how the
Coulomb barrier is overcome. Also, I would like to know how the
resulting energy is dissipated without producing significant
radiation. If you can answer these questions without too many
assumptions, I would be interested.
Ed
On Jun 18, 2009, at 9:06 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The theory has left the amateur level of ideas and entered the level
of the trained professional. This is also progress
Ed
So, individually, we stand almost no chance of contributing
anything to cold fusion, nor has any particularly practical way been
conceived to power a vehicle with it.(??!)
Not so I am an amateur and I am going to add to the new
understanding produced by this process.
My introduction to be published by IE. in sept.
Max Planck’s constant qualifies the angular momentum of the
stationary atomic state.9 The path of the transitional quantum
state has been unknown. Albert Einstein described the energy of a
photon with Planck’s constant.3 Niels Bohr applied these ideas to
the atomic structure. Bohr’s quantum condition states that the
angular momentum carried by a stationary atomic orbit is a multiple
of Planck’s constant.2 The quantization of angular momentum is a
postulate, underivable from deeper law. Its validity depends on the
agreement with experimental spectra. Werner Heisenberg and Erwin
Schrödinger extended these ideas and qualified the intensity of a
spectral emission. These great scientists found that the frequency
and the amplitude of the emitted photon is a function of the
differential in energy through which the electron drops. The
frequency and amplitude of a classical wave is that of the emitter.
The correspondence principle was invented in an attempt to explain
this discrepancy. It states the frequency and amplitude of a
classical system is equivalent to the energy drop within a quantum
system. These constructs form the foundation of modern physics.
The structure built upon this foundation considers the classical
regime to be a subset of the quantum realm.
Frank Znidarsic’s constant Vt qualifies the velocity of the
transitional quantum state. The transitional velocity is coupled
with a frequency and a displacement. The energy levels of the atom
were shown, in the body of this paper, to be a condition of the
transitional frequency. The intensity of spectral emission was
shown to be a function of the transitional amplitude. The action of
the transitional quantum state replaces the principle of quantum
correspondence. An extension of this work would universally swap
Planck’s and Znidarsic’s constants. There would have to be a
compelling reason make this change as it would confound the
scientific community. There are two good reasons for doing so.
Velocity is a classical parameter. The structure built upon this
foundation considers the quantum regime to be a subset of the
classical realm. Znidarsic’s constant describes the progression of
an energy flow. An understanding of this progression may lead to
the development of many new technologies.
Dell Days of Deals! June 15-24 - A New Deal Everyday!
