On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote:

> John Berry (he who signs not his name) wrote:
>
>>
>> Cold Fusion is somewhat fringe, but as much respect as I have for Jed's
>> dedication I can not imagine either in a technological nor
>> political-business-economic way in which cold fusion would be what powers
>> our houses or cars . . .
>
>
> Piece of cake. The only thing preventing it is politics and lack of
> knowledge.
>

I guess we have different opinions on how plausible a change of politics is,
or for that matter getting the right knowledge to the right places.


> Besides, even if some technical glitch prevented small scale use, it would
> still lower primary energy costs effectively to zero (but not distribution
> or equipment costs).
>
>
>
>> even if the science were totally sorted, further the experimentation is *
>> generally* beyond that which can be achieved outside of a good lab or
>> without good expertise.
>
>
> Far beyond. No point in discussing it. If you don't have a roomfull of
> gadgets such as SEM and mass spectrometers, forget it.
>
> The academic political opposition that has held back cold fusion is --
> finally! -- starting to crumble. I can see signs of it every week. Venture
> capitalists and the like are coming out of the woodwork in unprecedented
> numbers. Agencies that have not funded research since 1989 are funding it,
> and others are seriously considering it. New experiments are underway. A lot
> of this stuff is just starting up and I cannot talk about it, but in the
> next few months I hope I can. There will be some discussion of new work at
> the MIT seminar this Saturday.
>

Well that gives a rosier picture that I would have expected.
I don't know if your dedicated contribution to Vortex has anything to do
with this change though.

Just making a point that there should be more interest in subjects that can
lead to experimentation by the averagely skilled amateur experimentalist (of
which I am not, sadly) and can in theory lead to a grass roots FE (or AG)
revolution.

Reply via email to