GPT is at tool used in computer linguistics since more than 10 years.
It was just a matter of time until some brainless nerds would use it for
KI...
GPT just analysis and classifies text ====>the texts you give GPT. So
its not KI its the condensed shit some people want to throw at you.
But honestly what the US government does since 2020 where Biden founded
the project veritas - Orwell 1984 = truth ministry - is nothing else
than chat GPT does with. you.
Most newspapers today do no longer contain information. The focus is on
propaganda = spreading the view of the dominant class.
I regularly compare about 10 world top journals 4 languages/ continents
and all I see is identical "(dis-) information".
The top source of fake news are NYT,BBC,FAZ,NZZ, Figaro, .... Only a few
tiny local papers provide real information.
So please focus on how to get independent news and not on how to get
condensed shit from a KI text mixer...
J.W.
On 10.04.2023 22:50, Boom wrote:
Indeed, it can. It comes up with fake information. But now it is
heavily moderated to not allow that.
Em seg., 10 de abr. de 2023 às 16:33, H L V <hveeder...@gmail.com>
escreveu:
Can it dream?
Harry
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:49 AM Alain Sepeda
<alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote:
There are works to allow LLM to discuss in order to have
reflection...
I've seen reference to an architecture where two GPT instances
talk to each other, with different roles, one as a searcher,
the other as a critic...
Look at this article.
LLM may just be the building block of something bigger...
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/04/gpt4-with-reflexion-has-a-superior-coding-score.html
add to that, they can use external applications (plugin), talk
to generative AI like Dall-E...
Many people say it is not intelligent, but are we ?
I see AI making mistakes very similar to the one I do when I'm
tired, or beginner...
The real difference is that today, AI are not the fruit of a
Darwinian evolution, with struggle to survive, dominate, eat
or be eaten, so it's less frightening than people or animals.
The only serious fear I've heard is that we become so
satisfied by those AIs, that we delegate our genetic evolution
to them, and we lose our individualistic Darwinian struggle to
survive, innovate, seduce a partner, enjoying a bee-Hive
mentality, at the service of the AI system, like bee-workers
and bee-queen... The promoter of that theory estimate it will
take a millennium.
Anyway there is nothing to stop, as if a majority decide to
stop developing AI, a minority will develop them at their
service, and China is ready, with great experts and great
belief in the future. Only the West is afraid. (there is a
paper on that circulating, where fear of AI is linked to GDP/head)
Le lun. 10 avr. 2023 à 16:47, Jed Rothwell
<jedrothw...@gmail.com> a écrit :
I wrote:
Food is contaminated despite our best efforts to
prevent that. Contamination is a complex process that
we do not fully understand or control, although of
course we know a lot about it. It seems to me that as
AI becomes more capable it may become easier to
understand, and more transparent.
My unfinished thought here is that knowing more about
contamination and seeing more complexity in it has
improved our ability to control it.
Sean True <sean.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think it’s fair to say no AGI until those are
designed in, particularly the ability to actually
learn from experience.
Definitely! ChatGPT agrees with you!
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
