Indeed, it can. It comes up with fake information. But now it is heavily moderated to not allow that.
Em seg., 10 de abr. de 2023 às 16:33, H L V <hveeder...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Can it dream? > Harry > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:49 AM Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> There are works to allow LLM to discuss in order to have reflection... >> I've seen reference to an architecture where two GPT instances talk to >> each other, with different roles, one as a searcher, the other as a >> critic... >> Look at this article. >> LLM may just be the building block of something bigger... >> >> https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/04/gpt4-with-reflexion-has-a-superior-coding-score.html >> >> add to that, they can use external applications (plugin), talk to >> generative AI like Dall-E... >> >> Many people say it is not intelligent, but are we ? >> I see AI making mistakes very similar to the one I do when I'm tired, or >> beginner... >> >> The real difference is that today, AI are not the fruit of a Darwinian >> evolution, with struggle to survive, dominate, eat or be eaten, so it's >> less frightening than people or animals. >> The only serious fear I've heard is that we become so satisfied by those >> AIs, that we delegate our genetic evolution to them, and we lose our >> individualistic Darwinian struggle to survive, innovate, seduce a partner, >> enjoying a bee-Hive mentality, at the service of the AI system, like >> bee-workers and bee-queen... The promoter of that theory estimate it will >> take a millennium. >> Anyway there is nothing to stop, as if a majority decide to stop >> developing AI, a minority will develop them at their service, and China is >> ready, with great experts and great belief in the future. Only the West is >> afraid. (there is a paper on that circulating, where fear of AI is linked >> to GDP/head) >> >> >> Le lun. 10 avr. 2023 à 16:47, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >>> I wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Food is contaminated despite our best efforts to prevent that. >>>> Contamination is a complex process that we do not fully understand or >>>> control, although of course we know a lot about it. It seems to me that as >>>> AI becomes more capable it may become easier to understand, and more >>>> transparent. >>>> >>> >>> My unfinished thought here is that knowing more about contamination and >>> seeing more complexity in it has improved our ability to control it. >>> >>> >>> Sean True <sean.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think it’s fair to say no AGI until those are designed in, >>>> particularly the ability to actually learn from experience. >>>> >>> >>> Definitely! ChatGPT agrees with you! >>> >> -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
