Sean,

You asked "Is it meaningful to speak of "resonance" when something is
rotating in only one direction?"

Consider a car engine. Ignoring any internal resonances, it has a max-power
point at some frequency. If you add a muffler, you have modified the
external environment to the engine (most strongly at a given frequency).
The engine+ muffler now has a resonant frequency that may differ from that
of the muffler alone (e.g. with a different source). The muffler+engine
resonance can be "tuned" to alter the max-power point (increase power at a
given frequency or spread the max-power point to a larger frequency range).

To address the issue of resonance of bodies at the sub-micron scale:

Both classical and quantum physicists get fixed within their own framework.
"To a hammer, everything looks like a nail."

To consider an electron to be a rotating rigid body creates problems with
experimental evidence.
Relativity changes the shape of the electron *E*-field and thus creates a
magnetic field. The electron, being an EM creature, thus changes its shape
and properties with velocity. *Spin is one of those properties.* It does
not change in magnitude (except under extreme conditions - e.g.,
annihilation or combination); but, it does change direction. When an
electron is accelerated, its spin axis nutates (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutation) and precesses about the velocity
vector. When at high velocities (but w/o acceleration), its nutation will
be "pure" (nodding,  but with no precession).

This precession and nutation exists at all v > 0. The nutation can be
considered to be the basis of the deBroglie wavelength, where the
wavelength is determined by the distance traveled in a single nutation
cycle (my own definition). For a bound electron, which is accelerating all
of the time, precession of the spin axis about the axis of rotation is a
given. For a closed path in a conservative potential, an electron's total
energy is conserved and is constant at the resonance point(s) of the orbit
and precession. Thus, relativity, which also causes the magnetic field of a
moving charge at v>0, is the "exterior" environment that produces the
resonance for a stable orbit. The resonance is between the orbital
frequency and the frequency of precession (causing the deBroglie
wavelength). This resonance establishes the constant-total-energy orbits of
atomic electrons.

Understanding this and the resonances leading to photons and leptons
provides a basis for gravitation and the possibility of null-gravity (as in
photons), even if anti-gravity cannot be attained.

Andrew
_ _ _

On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 9:57 PM Sean Logan <paco66...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a question about things that rotate:  Is it meaningful to speak of
> "resonance" when something is rotating in only one direction (Clockwise,
> for example)?  When I think of "resonance", I think of a guitar string
> vibrating back and forth, or a parallel LC circuit, with the current
> flowing back and forth.  In both cases, the stuff is moving first one way,
> then the other.  We can talk about how many "back and forths" it makes in a
> given amount of time.  But what if you are spinning a flywheel in just one
> direction?  Is there some particular angular frequency which is
> special, based upon other parameters of the system (maybe the flywheel's
> mass)?  I don't think I'd call it a "resonant frequency", but I would call
> it something.  I mean, is there a particular diameter or rate of rotation
> at which a tornado can form and be stable -- any slower or faster and it
> would fly apart?  It sounds like that is what you are getting at with the
> electron, Andrew.
>
> An old mechanic I used to live with said something to me once to this
> effect:  That there was a particular RPM of the flywheel in an engine at
> which it was "resonant".  That the engine and transmission worked best and
> were happiest when the flywheel was rotating around this particular RPM.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 5:01 AM Andrew Meulenberg <mules...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I like your derivation. It appears to be another indication of the
>> resonance giving stability to the electron at a specific "size". A similar
>>
>

Reply via email to