I did look at some, not all, of the ones you put on tick tock. As for this one - blue skies - flashing like a semaphore - ergo - a firelantern with reflecting panels tumbling around in the wind.
Not rocket science is it. On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:13, Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you want to believe in little green men, be my guest. > > ..so you haven't looked at any of the evidence? Just wanted to say hello eh.. > > Well on the off-chance you ever get bored, or really want answers to these big > questions, maybe take a look in your own time.. I don't see anyone else > making > these connections.. The links won't last forever tho (none of them are > mine).. > > I suspect you only clicked that one link with a complete URL, showing two > tethered > cubes, every comment below exclaiming it was fire lanterns.. that was your > perusal > of the evidence, and the basis for your conclusion.. > > ..if i may insist however, this thing below is not a fire lantern: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiowRwpwVAQ&t=6s > > I didn't want to bomb-post embedded videos, hence the truncated links. Check > 'em out, > > tho, they'll tickle you i promise.. > > > But don't look up to the sky while riding that motorbike. > > You might finish up like the astronomer in Aesop's fable. > > Thing is, criss-crossing the country all day and night for three decades, > i've seen Chinese lanterns > many times.. always assuming this was the most prosaic explanation for > orange orbs. No matter > how far out in the sticks or how late at night, basically presuming that > most fire lanterns were released > by farmers.. for reasons.. because they're a thing, and LGM aren't. > > But what the evidence above shows is that a) some actually ARE aliens - > these flying orbs DO exist - > and b) that they're the same phenomenon as the flying cubes. They're > squares by day, disco lights > by night. > > As such, this is much bigger news than LENR, OU or reactionless propulsion > - likely encompassing > all these things, but certainly more besides - here's copious, visual > evidence of new physics, beyond > the SM, in action. > > We don't understand anything of these visitors' technology - what they're > doing, how or why. Their > evident presence however prioritises these questions. It's the > alternative - wilful ignorance - that's dumb. > > It's much like discovering that Bessler's wheel was actually a genuine > case of mechanical OU, now > forgotten and entirely dismissed.. evidence of physics BTSM, right under > our noses, if not low-hanging > fruit; a tantalising tease on what's possible, outside the box of today's > paradigm.. there in the offing.. > > How many times have YOU seen and ignored orange orbs on the assumption > fire lanterns were the > most-likely explanation? Because in retrospect, given the evidence here.. > maybe they've seen you too..? > > :P > >
