Jed
I found reference to the documentary -
https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristinharris/titanic-the-new-evidence
It wasn't as massive a fire as you are trying to make out. The facts as
presented by the documentary are disputed by some and there are
alternative facts of course, as per all good conspiracy theories have.
That covers Titanic, next the Japan Fukushima disaster-
Jed: As one engineer in Japan said: After a disaster, you can always
find a document on file recommending an improvement that would have
prevented the disaster. The problem is that if we did all recommended
improvements, no project would ever be finished and no power reactor
would go online. The tsunami was a once per thousand years event. Not
the sort of thing you would normally make a priority.
I think that bad and a cover up - usual thing to make excuses.
O-ring of Challenger disaster should never have happened, just bad
engineering.
Silkwodd pointed out bad engineering at Atomic plant and that made her a
martyr etc
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 18:17
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com
<mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
Jed:No one in his right mind would set to sea with a massive coal bunker
fire.
Exactly hence conspiracy
Nope. You are confused. There was no massive fire. If there had been,
the whole ship would have been filled with smoke, as I said. Also carbon
monoxide, which is what you get from spontaneous combustion deep in a
pile of coal. That is what reports of other bunker fires say. If there
was a fire, it was small.
It was massive but not that massive.
Massive enough to detect or cause damage would have been obvious to the
crew and passengers, who would have refused to board.
Jed: The people running Fukushima were also first class. Japanese
engineering is some of the best in the world.
And they didn't think about building a bigger sea wall?
They did think of it, and it was recommended, but they did not do it. As
one engineer in Japan said: After a disaster, you can always find a
document on file recommending an improvement that would have prevented
the disaster. The problem is that if we did all recommended
improvements, no project would ever be finished and no power reactor
would go online. The tsunami was a once per thousand years event. Not
the sort of thing you would normally make a priority.
