Jed: Which is probably farther than you know.
nah, you are making stuff up.
Jed:No one in his right mind would set to sea with a massive coal bunker
fire.
Exactly hence conspiracy
Jed: It would be obvious to everyone there was a fire. The ship would be
filled with smoke.
It was massive but not that massive. There was a documentary - photo of
Titamic before it set sail showed damage to the superstructure from the
heat.
Jed: Insurance did not pay for even a small fraction of the Titanic
disaster.
About recouping losses
Jed: First of all, the sailors on the Titanic were very competent.
nah, there was big strike on at the time that would have reduced ability
to get the best. There was a documentary taking a critical look at the
captain and decided he wasn't the best
Jed: The people running Fukushima were also first class. Japanese
engineering is some of the best in the world.
And they didn't think about building a bigger sea wall?
etc
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 16:46
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com
<mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
Jed: There were many coal bunker fires in the ships of that era. They
never sank a ship as far as I know.
So, as far as you know.
As far as you know
Which is probably farther than you know. As I said, I happen to know
about ships of that era, mainly from books, but also from old sailors,
long dead, who sailed on ships built at the same time as the Titanic.
That makes you think about the nature of time and history, doesn't it?
The past is not as distant as we think.
- would they be so incompetent that they would go to sea with a massive
coal bunker fire which they were finding impossible to put out?
No one in his right mind would set to sea with a massive coal bunker
fire. It would be obvious to everyone there was a fire. The ship would
be filled with smoke. The passengers would refuse to board. There might
have been a small fire. Such things were fairly common. It is likely
they would have extinguished it before setting sail. It was common
enough that they knew how to deal with it. Regulations ensured they
would know about even a small fire.
It was asking for the ship to sink as far as I am concerned, and you
get the money from insurance scam.
That's preposterous. Insurance did not pay for even a small fraction of
the Titanic disaster.
A series of unforunate events is easy to arrange as far as I am
concerned. If it takes a series of unfortunate events to cause a reactor
meltdown by a collection of people - then just employ incompetent people
at each stage of the process.
First of all, the sailors on the Titanic were very competent. They were
some of the best people in the industry, because it was a high status
ship and it paid well. The people running Fukushima were also first
class. Japanese engineering is some of the best in the world. Second, it
is not possible to deliberately cause something like the Titanic or
Fukushima disaster. No one can known in advance how to sabotage such
complex systems. They are designed with multiple layers of protection to
prevent that. Both disasters were almost -- but not quite -- prevented.
